Bridging the Gap: Harmonizing the Expectations of Employers and Employees for a Positive Workplace
Introduction
In a world of perfection, the objectives, values, and
expectations of employers and employees would naturally coincide, resulting in
a productive, interesting, and fulfilling work environment for everyone.
However, the truth is frequently different. Dissatisfaction, poor morale, and
even high turnover rates might result from misaligned expectations (Guest,
2017).
An essential component of employee relations is
comprehending and controlling these expectations. While employees expect job
security, fair salary, professional advancement, and pleasant work environment,
employers are looking for efficiency, dedication, and results (Armstrong &
Taylor, 2020). It takes more than just making concessions to close this gap; it
also requires cultivating a climate of respect and cooperation.
The Expectations Divide: What Employees and Employers Desire
1.
Employers’ Expectations
With the expectation that workers would contribute to the
success of the company, employers invest in their employees. Typical
expectations from employers include:
·
Performance and Productivity: Employers
anticipate that workers will efficiently provide results and achieve
performance goals (Boxall & Purcell, 2016).
·
Loyalty and commitment: Employers value staff
members who exhibit enduring dedication and share the company's goal (Marchington
et al., 2021).
·
Innovation and adaptability: Employers are
looking for workers that can adapt to changing business environments and
provide creative solutions (Torrington et al., 2017).
·
Professionalism and Teamwork: Fundamental
employer expectations include cooperation, respect for one another, and
adhering to corporate standards (Brewster et al., 2016).
2. Employees’ Expectations
On the other hand, workers enter companies with a set of
basic expectations:
·
Fair Compensation and Benefits: Financial
stability, health benefits, and competitive pay are important sources of
employee motivation (Armstrong & Taylor, 2020).
·
Work-Life Balance: To preserve their wellbeing,
workers look for flexibility, remote working choices, and moderate workloads (Kelliher
& Anderson, 2018).
·
Development and Career: Possibilities for skill
growth, advancement, and training are essential for jobs satisfaction (Cappelli
& Tavis, 2016).
·
Inclusive and Respectful work environment: Employees
appreciate working in environments that embrace diversity and acknowledge their
contributions (Mor Barak, 2016).
The Consequences of Misalignment
There may be several issues at work when employers' and
employees' expectations are not in line:
·
Low Engagement and Morale: Employees that feel
underappreciated or unheard often disengage, hurting their productivity (Gallup,
2021).
·
High Turnover Rates: Dissatisfied employees are
more inclined to look for work elsewhere, which raises the expense of hiring
new staff (Holtom et al., 2018).
·
Workplace Conflicts: Tension, arguments, and
strained employer-employee relationships can result from unfulfilled
expectations (Saundry et al., 2016).
Strategies for Bridging the Expectation Gap
It takes proactive approaches that promote openness,
dialogue, and mutual understanding amongst parties to achieve alignment.
1.
Open and Transparent Communication
Employers and employees can resolve conflicts and explain
expectations by having regular, genuine discussions. Communication and harmony
at work can be enhanced by setting feedback systems in place, such as staff
surveys and one-on-one meetings (Robinson & Rousseau, 1994).
2.
Fair and Competitive Compensation
Pay structures should be adjusted by organizations to
account for employee contributions and industry norms. Incentives including
flexible work schedules, professional development programs, and wellness
initiatives can improve employee happiness in addition to monetary remuneration
(Torrington et al., 2017).
3.
Participation of Workers in Decision-Making
Employee ownership and alignment with business objectives
are increased when they are involved in organizational decisions. Employee
dedication and motivation are increased when they participate in strategic
conversations and innovative projects (Marchington et al., 2021).
4.
Career progression and continuous Learning
A committed and competent workforce is produced by offering
mentorship programs, learning opportunities, and clear career development
pathways to employees. Workers are more likely to stay engaged if they perceive
a future with the company (Cappelli & Tavis, 2016).
Case Study: Google’s Approach to Aligning Expectations
Google is among the best instances of a business that has
effectively closed the gap between employee and employer expectations. The IT
company places a strong emphasis on work-life balance, employee empowerment,
and open communication. Google creates an environment where employer and
employee expectations are in line via efforts including professional
development programs, employee participation forums, and flexible work rules (Bock,
2015). As a result, Google consistently ranks among the best places to work.
Conclusion
Harmony in the workplace, increased productivity, and
long-term success all depend on bridging the expectations gap between employers
and employees. Companies can foster an atmosphere where employers and employees
flourish by placing a high priority on open communication, equitable pay,
career advancement, and a positive workplace culture. Businesses may transform
expectations gaps into chances for expansion and innovation by encouraging
respect and cooperation between parties.
References
- Armstrong,
M. and Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource
Management Practice. 15th edn. London: Kogan Page.
- Bock,
L. (2015). Work Rules! London: John Murray.
- Boxall,
P. and Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and Human Resource Management.
4th edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Brewster,
C., Chung, C. and Sparrow, P. (2016). International Human Resource
Management. 4th edn. London: Routledge.
- Cappelli,
P. and Tavis, A. (2016). 'The Performance Management Revolution'. Harvard
Business Review, 94(10), pp. 58-67.
- Gallup
(2021). State of the Global Workplace 2021 Report. Washington, DC:
Gallup Press.
- Guest,
D.E. (2017). 'Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a
new analytic framework'. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1),
pp. 22-38.
- Holtom,
B.C., Mitchell, T.R., Lee, T.W. and Eberly, M.B. (2018). '5 myths about
employee turnover'. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), pp. 82-89.
- Kelliher,
C. and Anderson, D. (2018). Flexible Working and Work-Life Balance: The
Right to Request and the Duty to Consider. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
- Marchington,
M., Wilkinson, A., Donnelly, R. and Kynighou, A. (2021). Human Resource
Management at Work. 7th edn. London: Kogan Page.
- Mor
Barak, M.E. (2016). Managing Diversity: Toward a Globally Inclusive
Workplace. 4th edn. London: Sage.
- Robinson,
S.L. and Rousseau, D.M. (1994). 'Violating the psychological contract: Not
the exception but the norm'. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
15(3), pp. 245-259.
- Saundry,
R., Hollinrake, A. and Forde, C. (2016). Managing Employment Relations.
London: Kogan Page.
- Torrington,
D., Hall, L., Taylor, S. and Atkinson, C. (2017). Human Resource
Management. 10th edn. Harlow: Pearson.
As you have already mentioned in your blogs there is always a gap between Employer and Employee expectations although the both work for a common goal, i really like the the example that you took from the google case study on how they were able to completely bridge the gaps between employee and employers expectation .
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for your comment. I'm happy you liked the Google case study. It's wonderful to observe how organizations like Google are able to efficiently resolve the expectations gap between employers and employees by maintaining open door policies and a common goal. It shows how important it is to comprehend and support all sides in order to create a success workplace.
Delete